• 首页期刊简介编委会刊物订阅专栏专刊电子刊学术动态联系我们English
引用本文:颜志文,龙云春,杨嘉永,陈方.度伐利尤单抗联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的最新成本-效果分析[J].中国现代应用药学,2026,43(9):151-157.
Yan Zhiwen,Long Yunchun,Yang Jiayong,Chen Fang.Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of Durvalumab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2026,43(9):151-157.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 64次   下载 29 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
度伐利尤单抗联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的最新成本-效果分析
颜志文1, 龙云春2, 杨嘉永1, 陈方1
1.厦门大学附属第一医院;2.成都中医药大学附属医院德阳医院
摘要:
目的 CASPIAN试验更新了度伐利尤单抗联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, ES-SCLC)的有效性与安全性,但尚无研究更新该方案的成本-效果性。故本研究拟从中国卫生体系角度出发更新度伐利尤单抗联合化疗治疗ES-SCLC的成本-效果性。方法 以CASPIAN研究结果为生存数据来源并纳入直接医疗成本建立分区生存模型。采用增量成本-效果比(Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER)作为主要评价指标,通过比较ICER与意愿支付值的大小判断度伐利尤单抗联合方案的成本-效果性。通过敏感性分析与情景分析验证结论的稳定性。结果 度伐利尤单抗联合化疗方案与单纯化疗方案相比得到的ICER为2 695 436元/QALY。PD阶段与PFS阶段的健康效用值和度伐利尤单抗的成本对ICER影响最大。敏感性分析与情景分析显示结论稳定。结论 度伐利尤单抗联合化疗治疗ES-SCLC在中国现有的经济水平下不具有成本-效果性。?
关键词:  度伐利尤单抗  小细胞肺癌  成本-效果分析  CASPIAN研究
DOI:
分类号:R956??????
基金项目:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所医院药学高质量发展研究项目专项课题(NIHAZX202413),厦门市卫生健康高质量发展科技计划青年科研课题课题(2024GZL-QN078),厦门市医疗卫生指导性项目(3502Z20244ZD1041)
Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of Durvalumab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
Yan Zhiwen1, Long Yunchun2, Yang Jiayong1, Chen Fang1
1.The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University;2.Deyang Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE The CASPIAN trial has updated the efficacy and safety data for Durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, no studies have reassessed the cost-effectiveness of this regimen based on these updated findings. Therefore, this study was designed to provide an updated cost-effectiveness analysis of the Durvalumab plus chemotherapy regimen for ES-SCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. METHODS A partitioned survival model was constructed utilizing updated survival data from the CASPIAN trial while incorporating direct medical costs relevant to the Chinese healthcare context. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) served as the primary outcome measure, with the cost-effectiveness of the durvalumab combination regimen determined through comparison of the ICER value against established willingness-to-pay thresholds in China. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the conclusions. RESULTS The ICER for the Durvalumab plus chemotherapy regimen compared to chemotherapy alone was 2 695 436 yuan/QALY. The progressive disease (PD) and progression-free survival (PFS) phases, along with the cost of Durvalumab, had the greatest impact on the ICER. Both sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrated the stability of the conclusions across various parameters. CONCLUSIONS Durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy is not cost-effective for ES-SCLC treatment under the current economic level in China. KEY WORDS: Durvalumab; Small-cell lung cancer; Cost-effectiveness analysis; CASPIAN study
Key words:  Durvalumab  Small-cell lung cancer  Cost-effectiveness analysis  CASPIAN study
扫一扫关注本刊微信