引用本文: | 陈志军,高文远,王颖.胰岛素泵治疗2型糖尿病的药物经济学评价[J].中国现代应用药学,2012,29(4):367-370. |
| CHEN Zhijun, GAO Wenyuan, WANG Ying.Analysis on Pharmaceutical Economics of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Injection for Treating Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2012,29(4):367-370. |
|
摘要: |
目的 比较胰岛素泵和传统皮下强化注射胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果。方法 将115例2型糖尿病住院患者分成2组,一组住院过程中使用胰岛素泵治疗(A组)58例,另一组强化皮下注射胰岛素(B组)57例,1周后观察2组的降糖效果。采用成本-效果分析法对2组患者进行分析,效果指标选择血糖降低有效率。结果 A组的成本为616.6元,有效率为96.6%;B组的成本为512.2元,有效率为91.2%,A组的成本效果比(C/E)为6.38,B组的C/E为5.62。A组与B组相比,每增加一单位有效率,需要增加成本1 933.33元。结论 强化皮下注射胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病具有较好的绝对经济效率,但与胰岛素泵治疗相比,后者具有较好的增量成本效果比。 |
关键词: 胰岛素泵 2型糖尿病 成本-效果分析 |
DOI: |
分类号: |
基金项目: |
|
Analysis on Pharmaceutical Economics of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Injection for Treating Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus |
CHEN Zhijun, GAO Wenyuan, WANG Ying1,2
|
1.School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;2.The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces, Tianjin 300162, China
|
Abstract: |
OBJECTIVE To compare the economical effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin injection(group A) and multiple daily injection(group B) for treating type-2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS Using cost-effectiveness analysis(CEA) on pharmaceutical economics to compare the cost effectiveness of the group A and group B. RESULTS The cost for group A and B were 616.6 and 512.2 Yuan, respectively. The total effective rates of controlling blood glucose were 96.6% and 91.2%, respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratios were 6.38 and 5.62, respectively. To increase one unit effective rate in group A need to raise the cost of 1 933.33 Yuan. CONCLUSION Group B has higher absolute economic efficiency for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. But group A has higher incremental cost effectiveness ratio than group B. |
Key words: continuous subcutaneous insulin injection type-2 diabetes mellitus cost-effectiveness analysis |