• 首页期刊简介编委会刊物订阅专栏专刊电子刊学术动态联系我们English
引用本文:杜彪,张杰,谢星星,周春阳,杜扬.马来酸依那普利叶酸片治疗H型高血压的系统评价[J].中国现代应用药学,2015,32(12):1488-1493.
DU Biao,ZHANG Jie,XIE Xingxing,ZHOU Chunyang,DU Yang.Systematic Review of Enalapril-folic Acid Tablet in Treatment of H-type Hypertension[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2015,32(12):1488-1493.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2311次   下载 1834 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
马来酸依那普利叶酸片治疗H型高血压的系统评价
杜彪1, 张杰2, 谢星星3, 周春阳2, 杜扬4
1.重庆三峡中心医院,重庆 404000;2.川北医学院,四川 南充 637000;3.四川医科大学,四川 泸州 646000;4.重庆医科大学,重庆 400016
摘要:
目的 系统评价马来酸依那普利叶酸片治疗H型高血压的临床疗效和安全性。方法 计算机检索CNKI、维普、万方、PubMed、Medline、EMbase和相关数据库,辅以文献追溯、网上查询等方法,检索建库至2015年5月31日国内外公开发表的马来酸依那普利叶酸片治疗H型高血压随机对照研究,采用RevMan 5.0软件进行定量综合分析。结果 共纳入17篇对照研究,合计H型高血压患者2 323例。其中14项研究介绍了SBP改变情况,结果显示:WMD=-6.73,95%CI:-10.13~-3.39,Z=3.93,P<0.05;14项研究介绍了DBP改变情况,结果显示:WMD=-6.76,95%CI:-10.23~-2.51,Z=5.96,P<0.05;17项研究介绍了Hcy改变情况,结果显示:WMD=-4.18,95%CI:-6.58~-3.03,Z=5.32,P<0.05;7项研究介绍了心脑血管事件发生情况,结果显示:OR=0.28,95%CI:0.18~0.43,Z=5.96,P<0.05。常见不良反应无显著性差异。结论 马来酸依那普利叶酸片治疗H型高血压的疗效和安全性优于马来酸依那普利。
关键词:  高血压  马来酸依那普利  马来酸依那普利叶酸片  同型半胱氨酸  系统评价
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:重庆市万州区科技计划资助项目(201403055)
Systematic Review of Enalapril-folic Acid Tablet in Treatment of H-type Hypertension
DU Biao1, ZHANG Jie2, XIE Xingxing3, ZHOU Chunyang2, DU Yang4
1.Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital, Chongqing 404000, China;2.North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China;3.Sichuan Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China;4.Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of enalapril-folic acid in the treatment of H-type hypertension. METHODS Retrieved from CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database, PubMed, Medline and EMBase, RCTs about Enalapril-folie acid treatment of H-type hypertension were collected and evaluated by Cochrane systematic review. Meta-analysis was carried out by using RevMan 5.0 software. RESULTS The 17 studies were included, involving 2 323 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was statistical significant between enalapril-folic acid and enalapril on SBP(WMD=-6.73, 95%CI: -10.13- -3.39, Z=3.93, P<0.05), DBP(WMD=-6.76, 95%CI: -10.23- -2.51, Z=5.96, P<0.05) and Hcy(WMD=-4.18, 95%CI: -6.58- -3.03, Z=5.32, P<0.05). The incidence of cardiovascular events in both group had significant difference (OR=0.28, 95%CI: 0.18-0.43, Z=5.96, P<0.05) and the common adverse reactions had no significant difference. CONCLUSION Enalapril-folic acid is more effective and safety than enalapril for treatment of H-type hypertension.
Key words:  hypertension  enalapril  enalapril-folic acid tablet  homocysteine  systematic review
扫一扫关注本刊微信