• 首页期刊简介编委会刊物订阅专栏专刊电子刊学术动态联系我们English
引用本文:杜江洋,柴青青,张聪,吴斌.多糖铁复合物治疗肾性贫血的有效性和安全性的meta分析[J].中国现代应用药学,2019,36(13):1673-1677.
DU Jiangyang,CHAI Qingqing,Zhang Cong,WU Bin.Efficacy and Safety of Polysaccharide Iron Complex in the Treatment of Renal Anemia: A Meta-analysis[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2019,36(13):1673-1677.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2436次   下载 1368 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
多糖铁复合物治疗肾性贫血的有效性和安全性的meta分析
杜江洋1, 柴青青2, 张聪3, 吴斌1
1.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院, 上海 200001;2.上海交通大学医学院附属胸科医院, 上海 200030;3.上海医药集团青岛国风药业股份有限公司, 青岛 266071
摘要:
目的 系统评价多糖铁复合物(polysaccharide iron complex,PIC)治疗肾性贫血的有效性及安全性,为临床提供循证参考。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、CNKI、WanFang Data和CBM等数据库,查找PIC对比其他口服铁剂治疗肾性贫血的随机对照试验文献,检索时限均为建库至2018年5月。由2位研究员按纳入与排除标准独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和偏倚风险评价,后采用ReMan5.3软件进行meta分析。结果 共纳入7项研究,包括642例患者(试验组354例,对照组288例)。Meta分析结果显示:与硫酸亚铁/琥珀酸亚铁相比,PIC治疗肾性贫血的临床有效性(P=0.02)、显效性(P<0.000 01)更好;PIC能明显改善患者的血红蛋白(P=0.02)、血清铁蛋白(P=0.009)、转铁蛋白饱和度(P<0.000 01)、红细胞压积(P=0.002)和红细胞(P=0.04)各项实验室指标;PIC的不良事件更少:恶心/呕吐(P<0.000 01)、腹痛/烧灼感(P=0.000 1)、便秘/腹泻(P=0.000 2)。结论 与硫酸亚铁/琥珀酸亚铁相比,PIC治疗肾性贫血具有更好的临床疗效及安全性。
关键词:  多糖铁复合物  肾性贫血  meta分析
DOI:10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2019.13.015
分类号:R969.3
基金项目:上海市卫生和计划生育委员会第四轮公共卫生三年行动计划重点学科建设项目(15GWZK0901)
Efficacy and Safety of Polysaccharide Iron Complex in the Treatment of Renal Anemia: A Meta-analysis
DU Jiangyang1, CHAI Qingqing2, Zhang Cong3, WU Bin1
1.Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200001, China;2.Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China;3.SPH Qingdao Growful Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266071, China
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of polysaccharide iron complex for patients with renal anemia. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM were searched from their inception to May 2018. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.RESULTS A total of 7 RCTs involving 642 patients (354 patients in the test group and 288 patients in the control group) with renal anemia were included. The meta-analysis results showed that:compared with ferrous sulfate/ferrous succinate, the effective rate(P=0.02) and significant effective rate(P<0.000 01) of renal anemia in PIC were higher. PIC significantly increased hematocrit(P=0.02), serum ferritin(P=0.009), transferrin saturation(P<0.000 01), hematocrit(P=0.002), red blood cell(P=0.04). adverse reactions of PIC were rare and mild:nausea/vomiting(P<0.000 01), abdominal pain/burning sensation(P=0.000 1), constipation/diarrhea(P=0.000 2).CONCLUSION Compared with ferrous sulfate/ferrous succinate, polysaccharide iron complex is effective and safe in the treatment of renal anemia.
Key words:  polysaccharide iron complex  renal anemia  meta-analysis
扫一扫关注本刊微信