• 首页期刊简介编委会刊物订阅专栏专刊电子刊学术动态联系我们English
引用本文:边雨,佟志军,魏晓雨,刘松枝,徐杰,宋德库,王美慧,姜文月.声光可调-近红外漫反射光谱法快速评价满山红药材质量[J].中国现代应用药学,2020,37(6):694-697.
BIAN Yu,TONG Zhijun,WEI Xiaoyu,LIU Songzhi,XU Jie,SONG Deku,WANG Meihui,JIANG Wenyue.Rapid Evaluation of the Quality of Rhododendri Daurici Folium by AOTF-NIR[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2020,37(6):694-697.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1910次   下载 1017 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
声光可调-近红外漫反射光谱法快速评价满山红药材质量
边雨1, 佟志军2, 魏晓雨1, 刘松枝2, 徐杰1, 宋德库2, 王美慧1, 姜文月1
1.吉林省现代中药工程研究中心有限公司, 长春 130012;2.吉林天力泰药业有限公司, 吉林 白山 134400
摘要:
目的 建立一种快速评价满山红药材质量的方法。方法 按中国药典2015年版满山红项下方法,对满山红药材水分、总灰分、酸不溶灰分及杜鹃素含量进行测定(作参考值);采用The Unscrambler分析软件,以偏最小二乘法和交叉-验证法建立满山红药材中水分、总灰分、酸不溶灰分及杜鹃素的定量校正模型(作预测值)。结果 药材样品中水分、总灰分、酸不溶灰分及杜鹃素定量模型交叉验证相关系数分别为0.928 6,0.918 5,0.957 6,0.928 9;校正均方根偏差(RMSEC)分别为0.087 5,0.144 7,0.012 8,0.003 2;预测均方根偏差(RMSEP)分别为0.305 5,0.232 1,0.016 0,0.004 9;外部验证偏差分别为1.01%,1.46%,2.65%,3.64%。结论 该方法快速、准确、简便、无污染,可用于满山红药材质量的快速评价。
关键词:  满山红  近红外漫反射光谱法  质量评价
DOI:10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2020.06.011
分类号:R917.101
基金项目:吉林省科技发展计划资助项目(20170307019YY)
Rapid Evaluation of the Quality of Rhododendri Daurici Folium by AOTF-NIR
BIAN Yu1, TONG Zhijun2, WEI Xiaoyu1, LIU Songzhi2, XU Jie1, SONG Deku2, WANG Meihui1, JIANG Wenyue1
1.Jilin Modern Chinese Medicine Engineering and Research Center Co., Ltd., Changchun 130012, China;2.Jilin Tianlitai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Baishan 134400, China
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To establish a rapid method for the quality evaluation of Rhododendri Daurici Folium. METHODS The contents of moisture, total ash, acid insoluble ash and farrerol were measured with the 2015 edition of Chinese Pharmacopoeia(as a reference). The herbs were analyzed by The Unscrambler program. Quantitative analytical models invoking the partial least square and the cross-validation algorithm simultaneously predicted the contents of four major indexes (as a prediction). RESULTS The Cross-validation correlation coefficient of moisture, total ash, acid insoluble ash and farrerol were 0.928 6, 0.918 5, 0.957 6 and 0.928 9. Root Mean Square Error of Calibration(RMSEC) of the correction set were 0.087 5, 0.144 7, 0.012 8 and 0.003 2, and the root mean square error of prediction(RMSEP) were 0.305 5, 0.232 1, 0.016 0 and 0.004 9; The external validation deviations were 1.01%, 1.46%, 2.65% and 3.64%. CONCLUSION The method is rapid, accurate, simple and pollution-free, and can be used for rapid evaluation of the quality of Rhododendri Daurici Folium.
Key words:  Rhododendri Daurici Folium  AOTF-NIDRS  quality evaluation
扫一扫关注本刊微信