• 首页期刊简介编委会刊物订阅专栏专刊电子刊学术动态联系我们English
引用本文:浦静雯,张慧,耿洲,潘杰.FMEA法在PIVAS抗肿瘤药物调配全流程风险管理中的应用[J].中国现代应用药学,2025,42(1):100-106.
PU Jingwen,Zhang Hui,Geng Zhou,Pan Jie.Application of FMEA Method in Risk Management of the Entire Process of PIVAS Antitumor Drugs Formulation[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2025,42(1):100-106.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 20次   下载 5 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
FMEA法在PIVAS抗肿瘤药物调配全流程风险管理中的应用
浦静雯, 张慧, 耿洲, 潘杰
苏州大学附属第二医院
摘要:
目的 提高静脉用药集中调配中心(PIVAS)抗肿瘤药物的调配质量,保障临床用药安全有效。方法 对PIVAS抗肿瘤药物调配全流程进行失效模式与效应分析(FMEA),找出风险点并计算其风险优先值(RPN),将RPN值较高的风险点列为优先改善对象,提出改进措施并对改善结果进行评价。结果 在PIVAS抗肿瘤药物调配全流程中,共找出16个需优先改善的风险点,研究团队从医嘱审核、临床宣教、环境监测、打包下送和滴注时间管理等几个主要方面对其进行整改。经过干预后,16个高风险点的RPN值总和由808降至318,全部降低为低风险,降幅达60.6%。医嘱差错件数、调配差错次数、环境监测不达标次数及配送差错次数等经改进后均显著下降(P<0.05)。结论 将FMEA应用于PIVAS抗肿瘤药物调配全流程风险管理,能够有效提高抗肿瘤药物的调配质量,降低差错。
关键词:  失效模式与效应分析  静脉用药集中调配中心  抗肿瘤药物  风险管理
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所医院药学高质量发展研究项目(编号:NIHAYS2313);江苏省科技项目,社会发展—面上项目(编号:BE2023708);苏州市药学会-江苏恒瑞临床药学科研基金研究项目(NO.Syhky201703)
Application of FMEA Method in Risk Management of the Entire Process of PIVAS Antitumor Drugs Formulation
PU Jingwen, Zhang Hui, Geng Zhou, Pan Jie
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE Improve the dispensing quality of antitumor drugs in pharmacy intravenous admixture service(PIVAS), and ensure the safety and effectiveness of clinical medication. METHODS Perform Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) on the entire process of PIVAS antitumor drugs formulation, identify risk points and calculate their Risk Priority Value (RPN). List high-risk points with high RPN values as priority improvement targets, propose improvement measures, and evaluate the improvement results. RESULTS In the entire process of PIVAS antitumor drugs dispensing, a total of 16 risk points that need to be prioritized for improvement were identified. The research team rectified them from several main aspects, including medical order review, clinical education, environmental monitoring, packaging and delivery, and drip time management. After intervention, the total RPN values of 16 high risk points decreased from 808 to 318, all of which were reduced to low-risk, with a decrease of 60.6%. Among them, the number of errors in medical orders, the number of errors in the dispensing process, unsuitable environmental requirements, and delivery errors have been significantly improved after improvement (P<0.05). CONCLUTION Applying FMEA to the entire process risk management of PIVAS antitumor drug admixture can effectively improve the quality of anti-tumor drug formulation and reduce error rates.
Key words:  Perform Failure Mode and Effects Analysis  Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Service  Antitumor Drugs  Risk Management
扫一扫关注本刊微信