引用本文: | 饶志方,凃静,程振玲.艾司氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂辅助治疗难治性抑郁症安全性meta分析[J].中国现代应用药学,2023,40(20):2878-2883. |
| RAO Zhifang,TU Jing,CHENG Zhenlin.Meta-analysis of the Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray Add-on Therapy for Treatment-resistant Depression[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2023,40(20):2878-2883. |
|
摘要: |
目的 采用meta分析全面了解艾司氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂辅助治疗难治性抑郁症的安全性。方法 搜索艾司氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂+口服抗抑郁药的随机对照试验,并进行meta分析。结果 最终5个随机对照试验,1 019例患者纳入研究。与对照组比较,试验组出现了更多的解离症状(RR=6.35,95% CI,2.84~14.23,P<0.000 01)、镇静(RR=5.47,95% CI,2.05~14.57,P=0.000 7)、嗜睡(RR=2.66,95% CI,1.30~5.44,P=0.007)、头痛(RR=1.38,95% CI,1.05~1.83,P=0.02)、眩晕(RR=5.87,95% CI,3.30~69.79,P<0.000 01)、头晕(RR=2.98,95% CI,1.33~6.68,P=0.008)、感觉迟钝(RR=10.25,95% CI,3.65~28.83,P<0.000 1)、焦虑(RR=2.01,95% CI,1.20~3.37,P=0.008)、感觉异常(RR=6.62,95% CI,2.75~15.98,P<0.000 1)、恶心(RR=4.05,95% CI,2.71~6.05,P<0.000 01)、味觉异常(RR=1.81,95% CI,1.35~2.42,P<0.000 1)。亚组分析显示,与对照组比较,艾司氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂28 mg组不良反应没有统计学意义;除了嗜睡、头痛、味觉异常以外,56,84 mg 2个亚组的不良反应有统计学意义。结论 艾司氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂辅助治疗会增加患者不良反应,但是不良反应轻微。 |
关键词: 艾司氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂 抑郁症 难治性 不良反应 meta分析 |
DOI:10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.20224126 |
分类号:R969.3 |
基金项目: |
|
Meta-analysis of the Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray Add-on Therapy for Treatment-resistant Depression |
RAO Zhifang, TU Jing, CHENG Zhenlin
|
CR-Wisco General Hospital, Wuhan 430080, China
|
Abstract: |
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of esketamine nasal spray add-on therapy for treatment-resistant depression by meta analysis. METHODS Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of esketamine nasal spray+oral antidepressants were searched and meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS Five RCTs and 1 019 patients were included in the study. Compared with contrast group, treatment group had more adverse reacions, such as dissociation(RR=6.35, 95%CI, 2.84-14.23, P<0.000 01); sedation(RR=5.47, 95%CI, 2.05-14.57, P=0.000 7); somnolence(RR=2.66, 95%CI, 1.30-5.44, P=0.007); headache(RR=1.38, 95%CI, 1.05-1.83, P=0.02); vertigo(RR=5.87, 95%CI, 3.30-69.79, P<0.000 01; diziness(RR=2.98, 95%CI, 1.33-6.68, P=0.008); hypoesthesia(RR=10.25, 95%CI, 3.65-28.83, P<0.000 1); anxiety(RR=2.01, 95%CI, 1.20-3.37, P=0.008); paresthesia(RR=6.62, 95%CI, 2.75-15.98, P<0.000 1); nausea(RR=4.05, 95%CI, 2.71-6.05, P<0.000 01); dysguesia(RR=1.81, 95%CI, 1.35-2.42, P<0.000 1). At the same time, compared with contrast group, in esketamine nasal spray 28 mg subgroup, it had no significant difference in adverse effects; while in 56, 84 mg subgroup, there was significant difference besides of somnolence, headache, dysguesia. CONCLUSION It is showed that the appearance of adverse events has increased, but it is very light in esketamine nasal spray add-on therapy for treatment-resistant depression. |
Key words: esketamine nasal spray depression treatment-resistant adverse reaction meta-analysis |